Should Trees Have Standing? Law, Morality, and the Environment
Should Trees Have Standing? continues to serve as the definitive statement as to why trees, oceans, animals, and the environment as a whole should be bestowed with legal rights.
Should Trees Have Standing? continues to serve as the definitive statement as to why trees, oceans, animals, and the environment as a whole should be bestowed with legal rights.
In Prosperity without Growth, Tim Jackson—a sustainability adviser to the UK government—makes a compelling case against continued economic growth in developed nations.
In the 1980s, the findings of Paul Crutzen and his team were used as the basis for the Montreal Protocol’s ban on the use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), identified as the primary cause for the hole in the ozone layer.
Barlow draws on her extensive experience and insight as a water activist to lay out a set of key principles that show the way forward to what she calls a “water-secure and water-just world.”
CERCLA gives the EPA the authority to intervene in order to clean up sites that are or could be potentially hazardous to the environment or public.
This book documents the burgeoning eco art movement from A to Z, presenting a panorama of artistic responses to environmental concerns.
Spanish translation of the essay “Sustainability and Climate Justice from a Theological Perspective” by Markus Vogt from “Climate Justice,” Perspectives 2010, no. 3.
Japanese translation of the essay “Sustainability and Climate Justice from a Theological Perspective” by Markus Vogt from “Climate Justice,” Perspectives 2010, no. 3.
Portuguese translation of the essay “Sustainability and Climate Justice from a Theological Perspective” by Markus Vogt from “Climate Justice,” Perspectives 2010, no. 3. Translated by Kátia M. Saita and revised by Thais K. Shinnishi.
In episode 42 of Nature’s Past, a podcast on Canadian environmental history, Sean Kheraj interviews David Boyd about his new book The Right to a Healthy Environment: Revitalizing Canada’s Constitution and discusses whether Canadians have a constitutional right to live in a healthy environment.