Interview with Anna L. Tsing, curator of Feral Atlas: The More-than-Human Anthropocene
In this episode from the New Books Network podcast, Anna L. Tsing is interviewed on her new project, Feral Atlas: The More-than-Human Anthropocene.
In this episode from the New Books Network podcast, Anna L. Tsing is interviewed on her new project, Feral Atlas: The More-than-Human Anthropocene.
This article argues that a paradigm change in political anthropology might be reasonable and realistic as a way of establishing dams against human self-destruction in the Anthropocene.
Chakrabarty responds to the contributors of this volume by addressing five issues he considers fundamental to discussions on climate change.
To help imagine longer temporal perspectives, a giant clock ticking every ten seconds was built in Texas in 1999. This is a chapter of the virtual exhibition “Welcome to the Anthropocene: The Earth in Our Hands”—written and curated by historian Nina Möllers.
In this episode from the New Books Network podcast, Joel Alden Schlosser is interviewed on his recent book, Herodotus in the Anthropocene.
Talk by Luke Keogh.
In this episode from the New Books Network podcast, Stacia Ryder, Kathryn Powlen, and Melinda Laituri are interviewed on their edited volume, Environmental Justice in the Anthropocene: From (Un)Just Presents to Just Futures.
In the special section “Provocations,” Noel Castree reviews the growing stream of publications authored by humanists about the Holocene’s proclaimed end. He argues that these publications evidence environmental humanists as playing two roles with respect to the geoscientific claims they are reacting to: the roles of “inventor-discloser” or “deconstructor-critic.”
John McNeill on the Anthropocene. This is an entry in the KTH EHL VideoDictionary.
The essay suggests that what is absent from the scientific discourse on the Anthropocene is a postcolonial perspective that points out the fact that we are not talking about generalizable social, economic, and cultural structures and belief systems, but that instead we are describing very specific political, economic, and discursive regimes of power.