ethics

In this paper Mark A. Michael argues that pragmatists and essentialists are arguing past one another and shows why that is.

What does the possibility of an early end to human existence as part of a more general biotic extinction mean for the latter day writing of history?

Walker focuses on uncertainty as a boundary device that shapes scientific ethos in crucial ways and negotiates a relationship between technical science and public deliberation.

Michael Adams reviews initial research exploring non-Indigenous hunting participation and motivation in Australia, as a window into further understanding connections between humans, non-humans, and place.

Callicott supposes that the environmental turn in the humanities, grounded in ecology and evolutionary biology, foreshadows an emerging NeoPresocratic revival in twenty-first century philosophy.

Mick Smith examines how a posthumanist notion of ecological community might attempt to address questions concerning extinction.

Mario Petrucci reviews the population-resource debate relating to Red, Green, and neo-Malthusian ideologies to demonstrate how they have ramified into current economic and development theory.

Barnabas Dickson analyses and criticises ethicist claims in environmental philosophy.

Karen Green applies Korsgaard’s distinctions—one between intrinsic and extrinsic value, and the other between having value as an end and having value as a means—to some issues in environmental philosophy.

In this paper Roger Fjellstrom argues that there is a lack of coherence between his ethical ideology and his actual ethical theory.