Peter Lucas responds to Laura Westra’s article “The Disvalue of ‘Contingent Valuation’ and the Problem of the ‘Expectation Gap’ ” (Environmental Values 9, no. 2 (2000): 153–71).
Roger Paden presents a critical analysis of Hare’s article “Contrasting Methods in Environmental Planning.”
Steven Luper discusses natural resources, gadgets, and artificial life.
Carrie L. Hull discusses debates taking place among environmental scientists, providing a brief overview of the history of the formalist tendency in philosophy, and an illustration of the ways in which advocates of a strict laboratory methodology implicitly rely on this foundation.
Brian Baxter makes an argument in favour of person-centricism over ecocentricism.
Avner De-Shalit discusses how the neglect of environmental philosophy in historical discourse of the environmental movement mistakenly identify “political ecology” with right-wing ideologies.
In this paper Roger Fjellstrom argues that there is a lack of coherence between his ethical ideology and his actual ethical theory.
Joachim Schuetz argues that sustainability should be interpreted as a quest for conscious adoption of a global systems identity.
In this essay, Nicole Klenk uses different interpretations of nature to make three distinct but related points relevant to forestry.
This paper addresses the leitmotif of Alan Holland’s work, which is argued here to be a defence of the existence and worth of nonhuman nature.
