policies

Richard Cookson examines Sagoff’s criticisms of “Four Dogmas of Environmental Economics” (Environmental Values, Winter 1994) and argues that none of them are fatal.

Clive L. Spash traces the thinking of a sub-group of established economists trying to convey an environmental critique of the mainstream into the late 20th century, via the development of associations and journals in the USA and Europe.

In this paper, Hein-Anton van der Heijden discusses Dutch politics of “New Nature.”

The article deals with some implications of radical uncertainty for participatory democracy, and more precisely for Participatory Technology Assessment (PTA).

The present paper is a commentary on very interesting papers by Thomas Dunlap, Thomas Hill, and Kimberly Smith, who take up the spiritual, ethical, and political perspectives respectively. Their accounts are described and evaluated.

This paper discusses the limitations, omissions, and value judgements of the application of conventional economic analysis in the evaluation of climate change mitigation policies.

In his article, Mick smith suggests an alternative model of political expression more suitable to an environmental ethic, the denizen.

This paper argues that restoration attempts should not be dismissed “out of hand,” and can be conducted outside of a “dominator logic.”

Frank G. Mueller attempts to assess and evaluate some of the economic implications of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

Markus J. Peterson and Tarla Rai Peterson make an argument for the synergy between deep, feminist, and scientific ecology towards improving environmental policy.