Communicating the Climate: From Knowing Change to Changing Knowledge
This volume explores the question of whether science should be centered in climate-change communication.
This volume explores the question of whether science should be centered in climate-change communication.
Born uses Critical Theory to explore the role of science in climate communication.
In this issue of RCC Perspectives, Marcus Vogt discusses climate change as an issue of justice. Sustainability, in Vogt’s view, needs to look to the humanities—to philosophy, theology, sociology, history, and cultural studies—for accompanying critical perspectives.
The essays in this collection explore how masculine roles, identities, and practices shape human relationships with the more-than-human world.
Kleemann argues that interdisciplinarity is key to successfully tackling climate change.
Noémi Gonda explores how the masculine figure of the cattle rancher plays a part in local explorations of climate change adaptation in Nicaragua.
This essay examines what the concept of the Anthropocene means for environmental law and policy. Humans can be viewed as both insider and outsider—as an integral part of nature, which we have a duty to protect, and as lord and master of the natural world, taking what we can for our own survival. Eagle explores how the choice of an insider or outsider view can influence political discussions regarding environmental regulation.
Goodbody examines the literary work Pandaemonium and its role in a research project to promote debate on climate change.
Tabak explores the potential of novels for communicating about climate change.
Walsh argues that science should be decentered in communicating about climate change.