"The Project Tiger Crisis in India: Moving Away from the Policy and Economics of Selectivity"
This paper discusses the economic and philosophical inadequacies that have characterized the Project Tiger scheme in India.
This paper discusses the economic and philosophical inadequacies that have characterized the Project Tiger scheme in India.
In this paper we analyse scientists’ perspectives on the release of genetically modified (GM) crops into the environment, and the relationship between their perspectives and the context that they work within.
This paper examines the social implications of sustainable consumption through an empirical study of a local organic food initiative.
This study empirically assesses the extent to which intrinsic value theories of nature are accepted and acknowledged outside the realm of academic environmental ethics.
In her essay, Katie McShane argues that even if we grant the truth of Bryan Norton’s convergence hypothesis, there are still good reasons to worry about anthropocentric ethics.
In his article, Edmundo Claro argues that in-kind compensation is more acceptable than monetary payments or no compensation because people tend to understand siting conflicts more as matters of justice rather than as matters of freedom or care.
This paper reports a Contingent Valuation application to estimate the non-market costs and benefits of hydro scheme developments in an Icelandic wilderness area.
This paper offers a critical assessment of the green case for deliberative democracy, showing that deliberation is being asked to deliver more than it is able to.
In this article, the author focusses on a particular kind of intragenerational equity—territorial equity.
Emily Brady’s editorial for Environmental Values 16.