The Reverse of the Sublime: Dilemmas (and Resources) of the Anthropocene Garden
Serenella Iovino uses the garden as a lens to analyze the impacts of old and new forms of aestheticizing nature on the geology of our planet.
Serenella Iovino uses the garden as a lens to analyze the impacts of old and new forms of aestheticizing nature on the geology of our planet.
This volume explores the question of whether science should be centered in climate-change communication.
Kleemann argues that interdisciplinarity is key to successfully tackling climate change.
Walsh argues that science should be decentered in communicating about climate change.
Oomen argues that science has an important role in climate communication as a common ground and honest broker.
Ashcroft explores how citizen science can connect professional scientists and the public.
Shortis suggests that the World Park Antarctica campaign offers a positive example of an environmental campaign that includes but does not center scientific authority.
Brill explores the relationship between “Science” and “the sciences”, and the political potential of the two, in the context of research cooperations involving indigenous groups.
Schur Petri demonstrates how local health workers can effectively communicate climate risks on the ground.
Born uses Critical Theory to explore the role of science in climate communication.