Crisp, Roger, "Animal Liberation is not an Environmental Ethic: A Response to Dale Jamieson"
Roger Crisp responds to Dale Jamieson’s views on animal liberation as environmental ethic.
Roger Crisp responds to Dale Jamieson’s views on animal liberation as environmental ethic.
Brian Baxter responds to Onora O’Neill’s argument that environmental ethics could and should be reformulated in terms of a search for the obligations held by moral agents towards each other, with respect to the non-human world.
Jon Wetlesen addresses the question: Who or what can have a moral status in the sense that we have direct moral duties to them?
J. Baird Callicott responds to Ben A. Minteer’s representation of his critique of moral pluralism.
Alan Carter seeks to advance our understanding of some of the possibilities within Humean moral theory, while simultaneously providing new foundations for both animal welfare and a wider environmental ethic.
Nigel Dower discusses human development in relation to environmental ethics.
Barnabas Dickson analyses and criticises ethicist claims in environmental philosophy.
Robert L. Chapman discusses how one might set moral boundaries relating to immigration and environment.
Mario Petrucci reviews the population-resource debate relating to Red, Green, and neo-Malthusian ideologies to demonstrate how they have ramified into current economic and development theory.
Clive L. Spash presents a critical review of some recent research by social psychologists in the US attempting to explain stated behaviour in contingent valuation.