Ashcroft explores how citizen science can connect professional scientists and the public.
Shortis suggests that the World Park Antarctica campaign offers a positive example of an environmental campaign that includes but does not center scientific authority.
Brill explores the relationship between “Science” and “the sciences”, and the political potential of the two, in the context of research cooperations involving indigenous groups.
Schur Petri demonstrates how local health workers can effectively communicate climate risks on the ground.
Born uses Critical Theory to explore the role of science in climate communication.
Gebhardt Fearns explores the potential of the immersive arts for communicating climate change.
Tabak explores the potential of novels for communicating about climate change.
Martinez emphasizes the importance of adapting climate communication strategies to local situations.
Kleemann argues that interdisciplinarity is key to successfully tackling climate change.
Oomen argues that science has an important role in climate communication as a common ground and honest broker.
