"Man and the Natural World: Reflections on History and Anthropology"
The efforts of both anthropologists and historians have been weakened by a failure to take into account what the other half were doing…
The efforts of both anthropologists and historians have been weakened by a failure to take into account what the other half were doing…
This paper discusses the contested and relational nature of indigeneity and challenges the ahistorical conceptualisation of indigenous knowledge.
Brian K. Steverson argues against James Sterba’s attempt to show that anthropocentrists and nonanthropocentrists would accept the exact same principles of environmental justice.
Tim Hayward discusses the reason for his claim that anthropocentrism is a misunderstood problem.
Tony Lynch and David Wells assert their objections to the idea of a non-anthropocentric ethic of nature.
Jon Wetlesen addresses the question: Who or what can have a moral status in the sense that we have direct moral duties to them?
Oluf Langhelle discusses expansion of the Rawlsian framework of global justice in relation to sustainable development.
In this paper Mark A. Michael argues that pragmatists and essentialists are arguing past one another and shows why that is.
This paper seeks to show that sociobiology does not pose the kinds of threat to humanism and environmentalism outlined by Hinchman.
This article comments on Katie McShanes theories on convergence and noninstrumental value.