"Valuing Birds in the Bush: For Pluralism in Environmental Risk Assessment"

Lucas, Peter | from Multimedia Library Collection:
Environmental Values (journal)

Lucas, Peter. “Valuing Birds in the Bush: For Pluralism in Environmental Risk Assessment.” Environmental Values 11, no. 2 (2002): 177–91. doi:10.3197/096327102129341046.

It is now widely acknowledged that social theorists can make an important contribution to our understanding of environmental risk. There is however a danger that the current ascendancy of social theory will encourage a tendency to assimilate issues around environmental risk to those at stake in entrenched debates between realist and constructivist social theorists. I begin by citing a recent example of this trend, before going on to argue that framing the issues in terms of a monism/pluralism dichotomy would make for a more informative analysis. Noting that realists and constructivists can make common cause against risk monism, I turn, in the second half of the paper, to setting out a positive case for risk pluralism. Citing some fictional examples of risk behaviour, I show how different individuals might rationally adopt different perspectives on the same risk. I conclude by exploring some implications of the truth of risk pluralism for two current approaches to environmental decision-making (which I term, respectively, the ‘teleological-pluralistic’ approach, and the ‘economic-monistic’ approach). I argue that the importance of risk pluralism lies in its capacity to highlight the shortcomings of the latter approach.

— Text from The White Horse Press website

All rights reserved. © 2002 The White Horse Press